SCIENTER

DjjJvk…DWuv on Solana

DjjJvkuDQRdRGSAAdSG6KsbicMbGjczZV4zKYK6sDWuv

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

The wallet that created this token

162 of this wallet's 174 settled launches died — 93.1%. It is not flagged only because 12 survived, and the rule requires every settled launch to have died. Read the rate, not the flag: on the record published here this wallet looks like the flagged ones, not like a wallet with a mixed record.

Settled launches
174
outcome had resolved when measured
Still live
12
listed with tradeable liquidity
Died
162
illiquid or delisted
Base rate
4.34%
survive with no record, against 0.80% flagged

Nothing was known about this wallet when this token launched. It had no earlier launch whose outcome had resolved yet, so this screen could not have spoken about it at the time. That is not a clean result: it means the record above is hindsight, not something a buyer could have acted on.

This deployer launched nothing else in the 24 hours before this token. This rule is measured retrospectively and has no prospective score yet.

This is a record of what this wallet's other launches did, measured between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-20. It is a negative screen, not a recommendation, and it says nothing about who controls this token now or who profited from it. The full record for this wallet.

Not in the current ranked snapshot

The ranker has not scored this address in its current window of recent launches. This is an absence of analysis, not a finding: nothing here says the token is safe.

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.