673pAz…pump on Solana
673pAz9WCaPtdW9cP3LS6mEM6wv4ZGzA9JhuLu56pump
Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.
Contract checks
Reading the contract…
The wallet that created this token
Every one of this wallet's 11 settled launches has died. Launches like these were still listed at least a day later about once in every hundred and twenty-five, against about one in twenty-three for a launch this screen does not flag.
When this token launched, this wallet had 3 earlier launches whose outcomes had already resolved, and 3 of them had died. Every one, so this screen would have flagged this token at the time. The figures above are cumulative and include launches made since.
This deployer launched 1 other token in the 24 hours before this one. Launches like that were several times less likely to still be listed a day later. This rule is measured retrospectively and has no prospective score yet.
This is a record of what this wallet's other launches did, measured between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-20. It is a negative screen, not a recommendation, and it says nothing about who controls this token now or who profited from it. The full record for this wallet.
Not in the current ranked snapshot
The ranker has not scored this address in its current window of recent launches. This is an absence of analysis, not a finding: nothing here says the token is safe.
Composite rug score
Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.
Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.