SCIENTER

0xe6d4…0fd8 on Ethereum

0xe6d4f26d7f24d045dd79c1fbe51955e7a3660fd8

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
31
of 60 ranked
Decile
6
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
50%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
81%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 6 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 17:12 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one19% of attribution · observed 0
  • raisesintegrity: reserve updates not explained by trades7% of attribution · observed 1.166667
  • raisessupply: share of total supply put in the pool6% of attribution · observed 1

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.