SCIENTER

0xe2e2…5121 on Ethereum

0xe2e27e9f4676a1f19be8c2b298d7fbc155335121

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
59
of 60 ranked
Decile
10
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
3%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in the least risky tenth of the ranked launches, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 21:51 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • lowersintegrity: reserve updates not explained by trades14% of attribution · observed 0
  • lowersdeployer: share of activity that is deploying9% of attribution · observed 0
  • raisesdeployer: wallet age at launch7% of attribution · observed 0.015139

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.