SCIENTER

0xd736…8c0d on Ethereum

0xd7366263b9bd165d25eda7f2c91054c2fcbb8c0d

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
20
of 60 ranked
Decile
4
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
68%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 4 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 22:45 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one16% of attribution · observed 0
  • raisesintegrity: reserve updates not explained by trades7% of attribution · observed 1.105263
  • raisesdeployer: wallet age at launch6% of attribution · observed 0.001111

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.