0xcf05…f66a on Ethereum

0xcf057dcfeedb9977256a99fb079d6d3b3d04f66a

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

1 adverse finding in the contract checks.

medium
Unverified source
The contract source is not verified; these checks rest on bytecode analysis alone.
not checked
Contract ownercore
GoPlus did not report an owner for this contract.
not checked
Hidden ownercore
GoPlus did not report whether a hidden owner exists.
not checked
Ownership can be reclaimedcore
GoPlus did not report whether ownership can be reclaimed.
not checked
Honeypotcore
GoPlus did not report a honeypot simulation for this token.
not checked
Sell taxcore
GoPlus did not report the sell tax.
not checked
Mintablecore
GoPlus did not report whether new supply can be minted.
pass
Buy taxcore
No buy tax.
pass
Liquidity can be pulledcore
100% of LP is locked or burned.

Checked 2026-10-14 08:08 UTC · sources: goplus

Reading the contract…

Rank

of 60 ranked

Decile

1 is the riskiest tenth

Percentile

47%

position in the batch, not a probability

Evidence

81%

of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 6 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 16:20 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one18% of attribution · observed 0.000001
lowersbytecode: density of external calls8% of attribution · observed 0.0012
raisesintegrity: reserve updates not explained by trades7% of attribution · observed 1.142857

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.