SCIENTER

0xa86e…be07 on Ethereum

0xa86e45413e2c136e4ecc571e2c2d08ccb8c8be07

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
40
of 60 ranked
Decile
7
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
35%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 7 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 17:26 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisessupply: share of total supply put in the pool6% of attribution · observed 0.9
  • lowersLP: liquidity already draining in hour one6% of attribution · observed 0.865392
  • raisesbytecode: number of callable functions5% of attribution · observed 17

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.