SCIENTER

0xa708…00d9 on Ethereum

0xa70814a13a7fd681115b56f9b341b004f4d900d9

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
39
of 60 ranked
Decile
7
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
37%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 7 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 13:58 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • lowersLP: liquidity already draining in hour one5% of attribution · observed 0.793638
  • raisesflow: value sold per value bought5% of attribution · observed 0.542841
  • raisessupply: share of total supply put in the pool5% of attribution · observed 0.9

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.