0xa179…6901 on Ethereum

0xa1796523f54ef1318ba648e57ec7b7cf92e36901

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

No adverse findings, but some core checks did not answer, so this is incomplete.

not checked
Contract ownercore
GoPlus did not report an owner for this contract.
not checked
Liquidity can be pulledcore
0% of LP is provably locked or burned; the largest remaining holder (100%) is a contract GoPlus does not mark as a locker, so whether it can withdraw is not known.
pass
Hidden ownercore
No hidden owner.
pass
Ownership can be reclaimedcore
Ownership cannot be reclaimed.
pass
Honeypotcore
A simulated buy and sell both went through.
pass
Buy taxcore
No buy tax.
pass
Sell taxcore
No sell tax.
pass
Mintablecore
No mint function.

Checked 2026-10-14 09:05 UTC · sources: goplus

Reading the contract…

Rank

of 60 ranked

Decile

1 is the riskiest tenth

Percentile

23%

position in the batch, not a probability

Evidence

81%

of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 8 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 15:19 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

lowersprice: volatility across the first hour6% of attribution · observed 0.007902
lowersLP: liquidity already draining in hour one6% of attribution · observed 1
raisesbytecode: number of callable functions5% of attribution · observed 16

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.