SCIENTER

0x7fd8…2db1 on Ethereum

0x7fd8fbfd1ebb8bd1623f9d0e5264b152c0c22db1

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
41
of 60 ranked
Decile
7
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
33%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
81%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 7 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 14:34 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one20% of attribution · observed 0.000001
  • raisesLP: pool size at the end of the hour8% of attribution · observed 0.000005
  • lowersbytecode: density of external calls7% of attribution · observed 0.001318

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.