SCIENTER

0x7ae2…1136 on Ethereum

0x7ae2c9ba03d6a1ed0a75d51636f29e593e061136

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
38
of 60 ranked
Decile
7
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
38%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 7 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 16:59 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one17% of attribution · observed 0
  • lowersbytecode: density of external calls9% of attribution · observed 0.001204
  • lowersLP: size of the opening pool7% of attribution · observed 0.49044

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.