SCIENTER

0x7a71…4a09 on Ethereum

0x7a71be4fdb6d5e73eff3099f4d2fba049ae24a09

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
6
of 60 ranked
Decile
1
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
92%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in the riskiest tenth of the ranked launches, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 19:44 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one15% of attribution · observed 0
  • raisesdeployer: wallet age at launch5% of attribution · observed 0.000833
  • raisessupply: share of total supply put in the pool4% of attribution · observed 1

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.