SCIENTER

0x6929…2555 on Ethereum

0x69292aa835491a21c82a5afec3d13d43c2b72555

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
56
of 60 ranked
Decile
10
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
8%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
81%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in the least risky tenth of the ranked launches, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 14:29 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one19% of attribution · observed 0
  • lowersintegrity: reserve updates not explained by trades13% of attribution · observed 1.009709
  • raisesLP: pool size at the end of the hour7% of attribution · observed 0.000004

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.