SCIENTER

0x4ff0…7f3b on Ethereum

0x4ff02754cf6427316ac42669982b4e797b597f3b

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
25
of 60 ranked
Decile
5
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
60%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in decile 5 of ten, where decile 1 is the riskiest, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 22:44 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • lowersprice: volatility across the first hour6% of attribution · observed 0.009745
  • raisesbytecode: number of callable functions6% of attribution · observed 16
  • raisesdeployer: wallet age at launch5% of attribution · observed 0.000833

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.