SCIENTER

0x35dc…c11c on Ethereum

0x35dc3132cb3cf1658b8ece135b1674eba892c11c

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
52
of 60 ranked
Decile
9
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
15%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
97%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in the least risky tenth of the ranked launches, and 97% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 14:26 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • raisesLP: liquidity already draining in hour one17% of attribution · observed 0.000001
  • lowersdeployer: share of activity that is deploying9% of attribution · observed 0
  • lowersbytecode: density of external calls8% of attribution · observed 0.001317

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.