SCIENTER

0x1384…684c on Ethereum

0x1384bd629b1e9b2aba0d3965dfc706cf1f3c684c

Rank, not probability. This list orders tokens against each other by a model's risk ranking. A position on it is not a probability that a token will rug, and no such probability is published.

Contract checks

Reading the contract…

Rank
57
of 60 ranked
Decile
10
1 is the riskiest tenth
Percentile
7%
position in the batch, not a probability
Evidence
81%
of model inputs observable

This launch is in the least risky tenth of the ranked launches, and 81% of the model's inputs were observable for this token. Observed 2026-10-04 14:32 UTC, in its first hour of trading.

What moved the rank

  • lowersLP: liquidity already draining in hour one8% of attribution · observed 0.945617
  • lowersbytecode: number of callable functions6% of attribution · observed 32
  • lowersbytecode: density of external calls5% of attribution · observed 0.001113

Evidence

Composite rug score

Automated risk scoring is switched off in this deployment. Scienter publishes forensic findings with citations rather than model output that has not passed its honesty gates. Nothing here is a statement about this address.

Not financial advice. A rank is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any named party. Open the evidence and judge for yourself. Why ranks and not probabilities.